1)Bosi E, et al:Efficacy and safety of suspend-before-low insulin pump technology in hypoglycaemia-prone adults with type 1 diabetes(SMILE);An open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 7:462-472, 2019 PMID 31047902
670G system in Europe. Diabetes Obes Metab 23:1942-1949, 2021 PMID 33961340
3)Collyns OJ, et al:Improved glycemic outcomes with medtronic MiniMed advanced hybrid closed-loop delivery;Results from a randomized crossover trial comparing automated insulin delivery with predictive low glucose suspend in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 44:969-975, 2021 PMID 33579715
advanced hybrid closed-loop delivery compared to predictive low glucose suspend in people with Type 1 Diabetes in a randomized crossover trial. Acta Diabetol 59:31-37, 2022 PMID 34453208
4 sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023(Online adeahd of print)PMID 37252734
780G system achieves clinical targets for CGM in adults with type 1 diabetes regardless of previous insulin strategy and baseline glucose control. Acta Diabetol 59:1309-1315, 2022 PMID 35857108
7)ElSayed NA, et al:7. Diabetes technology;Standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care 46:S111-S127, 2023 PMID 36507635
8)Sherr JL, et al:Automated insulin delivery;Benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report of the Joint Diabetes Technology Working Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetologia 66:3-22, 2023 PMID 36198829
9)Urakami T, et al:Frequent scanning using flash glucose monitoring contributes to better glycemic control in children and adolescents with type1 diabetes. J Diabetes Investig 13:185-190, 2022 PMID 34143544
10)Lameijer A, et al:Flash glucose monitoring in the netherlands;Increased monitoring frequency is associated with improvement of glycemic parameters. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 177:108897, 2021 PMID 34098059
11)Elbalshy M, et al:Effect of divergent continuous glucose monitoring technologies on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus;A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Diabet Med 39:e14854, 2022 PMID 35441743
12)Visser MM, et al:Effect of switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes;24-month results from the randomised ALERTT1 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 11:96-108, 2023 PMID 36702566
13)Beck RW, et al:Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections;The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 317:371-378, 2017 PMID 28118453
14)Puhr S, et al:Real-world hypoglycemia avoidance with a continuous glucose monitoring system's predictive low glucose alert. Diabetes Technol Ther 21:155-158, 2019 PMID 30896290
15)Feig DS, et al:Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes(CONCEPTT);A multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet 390:2347-2359, 2017 PMID 28923465
16)Martens T, et al:Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with Basal insulin;A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325:2262-2272, p 2021 PMID 34077499
17)Grace T, Salyer J:Use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring improves glycemic control and other clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients treated with less intensive therapy. Diabetes Technol Ther 24:26-31, 2022 PMID 34524013
18)Holt RIG, et al:The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association(ADA)and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes(EASD). Diabetes Care 44:2589-2625, 2021 PMID 34593612