Neurological Surgery 脳神経外科49巻6号

2021年11月発行

特集 脊髄脊椎・末梢神経外科ことはじめ Ⅲ　頚椎変性疾患

頚椎後方除圧術—バリエーションと手術手技のポイントは？

著者： 梅林大督¹ 永井利樹¹ 西井翔¹ 橋本直哉¹

所属機関： ¹京都府立医科大学大学院脳神経機能再生外科学（脳神経外科学）

ページ範囲：P.1211 - P.1223

Point
・頚椎後方除圧術には複数の手術手技があり，各手術手技においても多くのバリエーションが存在する．また，各術式間の有効性の違いや優位性には未だ議論が残る．
・実臨床においては，それぞれの術式の特性を理解して精通している手技を使い分けることが望ましい．
・手術手技の詳細においても多様な考察の下にさまざまな工夫が行われているが，基本的な留意点は共通しており，これらを理解して手術を行うことが重要である．

参考文献

1）Fujiyoshi T, et al：A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament：the K-line. Spine（Phila Pa 1976）33：E990-E993, 2008

2）Naderi S, et al：Cervical spondylotic myelopathy：surgical decision making. Neurosurg Focus 1：e1, 1996

3）Bridges KJ, et al：Combined laminoplasty and posterior fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy treatment：a literature review. Asian Spine J 12：446-458, 2018

4）Aita I, et al：Posterior movement and enlargement of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80：33-37, 1998

5）Suda K, et al：Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine（Phila Pa 1976）28：1258-1262, 2003

6）Bajamal AH, et al；World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies（WFNS）Spine Committee：Posterior surgical techniques for cervical spondylotic myelopathy：WFNS Spine Committee recommendations. Neurospine 16：421-434, 2019

7）Bartels RH, et al：Laminoplasty and laminectomy for cervical sponydylotic myelopathy：a systematic review. Eur Spine J 24 （Suppl 2）：160-167, 2015

8）桐田良人：広範囲・同時除圧式椎弓切除術について．日整会誌 58：241-252, 1984

9）Jain A, et al：Does segmental kyphosis affect surgical outcome after a posterior decompressive laminectomy in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Asian Spine J 11：24-30, 2017

10）Mikawa Y, et al：Spinal deformity and instability after multilevel cervical laminectomy. Spine（Phila Pa 1976）12：6-11, 1987

11）Miyazaki K, Kirita Y：Extensive simultaneous multisegment laminectomy for myelopathy due to the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical region. Spine（Phila Pa 1976）11：531-542, 1986

12）Kawaguchi Y, et al：Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411：129-139, 2003

13）Shiraishi T：A new technique for exposure of the cervical spine laminae. Technical note. J Neurosurg 96（1 Suppl）：122-126, 2002

14）Shiraishi T：Skip laminectomy-a new treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, preserving bilateral muscular attachments to the spinous processes：a preliminary report. Spine J 2：108-115, 2002

15）Shiraishi T, Yato Y：New double-door laminoplasty procedure for the axis to preserve all muscular attachments to the spinous process：technical note. Neurosurg Focus 12：E9, 2002

16）Kotani Y, et al：Impact of deep extensor muscle-preserving approach on clinical outcome of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy：comparative cohort study. Eur Spine J 21：1536-1544, 2012

17）Ito M, Nagahama K：Laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. Global Spine J 2：187-194, 2012

18）Rhee JM, Basra S：Posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy：laminectomy, laminectomy with fusion, and laminoplasty. Asian Spine J 2：114-126, 2008

19）Stephens BF, et al：Laminoplasty does not lead to worsening axial neck pain in the properly selected patient with cervical myelopathy：a comparison with laminectomy and fusion. Spine（Phila Pa 1976）42：1844-1850, 2017

20）Koshu K, et al：Spinous process-splitting laminoplasty with an extended foraminotomy for cervical myelopathy. Neurosurgery 37：430-434；discussion 434-435, 1995

21）Ratliff JK, Cooper PR：Cervical laminoplasty：a critical review. J Neurosurg 98（3 Suppl）：230-238, 2003

22）Kim P, et al：Myoarchitectonic spinolaminoplasty：efficacy in reconstituting the cervical musculature and preserving biomechanical function. J Neurosurg Spine 7：293-304, 2007

23）Iizuka H, et al：Extensor musculature of the cervical spine after laminoplasty：morphologic evaluation by coronal view of the magnetic resonance image. Spine（Phila Pa 1976）26：2220-2226, 2001

24）Matsuzaki H, et al：Dome-like expansive laminoplasty for the second cervical vertebra. Spine（Phila Pa 1976）14：1198-1203, 1989

25）Takeuchi K, et al：Axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy compared with conventional C3-C7 laminoplasty：a modified laminoplasty preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis. Spine（Phila Pa 1976）30：2544-2549, 2005

26）平林　洌：頚髄症に対する後方除圧法としての片開き式頚部脊柱管拡大術について．手術 32：1159-1163, 1978

27）黒川高秀，他：棘突起縦割法頚椎脊柱管拡大術．別冊整形外 2：234-240, 1982

28）Kim TH, et al：T1 slope as a predictor of kyphotic alignment change after laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine（Phila Pa 1976）38：E992-E997, 2013

29）Hyun SJ, et al：Assessment of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis criteria of a cervical spine deformity classification system using long-term follow-up data after multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery. Oper Neurosurg（Hagerstown）16：20-26, 2019

30）Vernon H, Mior S：The neck disability index：a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14：409-415, 1991

31）Tang JA, et al；International Spine Study Group（ISSG）：The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 71：662-669；discussion 669, 2012

32）Lin BJ, et al：Impact of global spine balance and cervical regional alignment on determination of postoperative cervical alignment after laminoplasty. Medicine（Baltimore）97：e13111, 2018

33）清水敬親，他：脊柱管拡大術後頚椎前弯位保持に関する検討．東日臨整外会誌 3：385-387, 1991

34）Alonso F, et al：Potential mechanism for some postoperative C5 palsies：an anatomical study. Spine（Phila Pa 1976）43：161-166, 2018

35）高安正和（編）：脳神経外科エキスパート　脊髄・脊椎　基本編．中外医学社，東京，2009, p. 78

36）Kawaguchi Y, et al：Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 12：392-395, 1999

37）上田茂雄，他：頚椎椎弓形成術における外側溝の位置について：解剖学的見地からの検討．脊髄外科 25：147-152, 2011

38）川本俊樹，他：頸椎変性疾患：後方手術における合併症とその対策．脊椎脊髄 25：757-764, 2012