1)Eisenhauer EA, et al:New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours:revised RECIST guideline(version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228-247, 2009
2)厚生労働省:「抗悪性腫瘍薬の臨床評価方法に関するガイドライン」について.薬生薬審発0331第1号 令和3年3月31日. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000243746.pdf(2024年3月29日アクセス)
3)Minami H, et al:Guidelines for clinical evaluation of anti-cancer drugs. Cancer Sci 112:2563-2577, 2021
4)渡邉真哉,他:膠芽腫を対象とした第Ⅱ 相試験で設定される有効性エンドポイントの近年の傾向に関する調査研究.医薬品医療器レギュラトリーサイエンス 52:358-367, 2021
5)Wen PY, et al:Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas:response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963-1972, 2010
6)Okada H, et al:Immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology:a report of the RANO working group. Lancet Oncol 16:e534-e542, 2015 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00088-1
7)Lin NU, et al;Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology(RANO)group:Response assessment criteria for brain metastases:proposal from the RANO group. Lancet Oncol 16:e270-e278, 2015 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70057-4
8)Juratli TA, et al:Is there pseudoprogression in secondary glioblastomas? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:1094-1099, 2013
9)症候性放射線脳壊死診療ガイドライン作成委員会:症候性放射線脳壊死診療ガイドライン.Jpn J Neurourg(Tokyo)26:287-306, 2017
10)Thomas Kaley, et al:Historical benchmarks for medical therapy trials in surgery- and radiation-refractory meningioma:a RANO review. Neuro Oncol 16:829-840, 2014
11)Huang RY, et al:Proposed response assessment and endpoints for meningioma clinical trials:report from the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group. Neuro Oncol 21:26-36, 2019
12)Watanabe S, et al:Efficacy endpoints in phase Ⅱ clinical trials for meningioma:an analysis of recent clinical trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci 57:603-610, 2023
13)National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://clinicaltrials.gov/(2024年3月29日アクセス)