1)Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M et al:The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese:the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology 111:1641-1648, 2004
2)Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A et al:Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1730-1742, 2000
3)Anderson D, Patella V:Interpretation of a single field. In:Anderson D, Patella V(eds):Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd ed. 152-153, Mosby, St Louis, 1999
4)村田敬勝・矢野栄二:Evidence Based Medicineのための医学統計―SPBSの活用方法.南江堂,東京,2002
5)Ohkubo S, Takeda H, Higashide T et al:A pilot study to detect glaucoma with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy compared with nonmydriatic stereoscopic photography in a community health screening. J Glaucoma 16:531-538, 2007
6)Harasymowycz PJ, Papamatheakis DG, Fansi AK et al:Validity of screening for glaucomatous optic nerve damage using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy(Heidelberg Retina TomographⅡ)in high-risk populations. A pilot study. Ophthalmology 112:2164-2171, 2005
7)Coops A, Henson DB, Kwarts AJ et al:Automated analysis of Heidelberg retina tomograph optic images by glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:5348-5355, 2006
8)Ferreras A, Pajarin AB, Polo V et al:Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications:glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis. Ophthalmology 114:1981-1987, 2007
9)Moreno-Montanes J, Anton A, Garcia N et al:Glaucoma probability score vs Moorfields classification in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 145:360-368, 2008
10)Ferreras A, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB et al:Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 145:354-359, 2008