臨床眼科71巻2号

2017年02月発行

連載 今月の話題

視野検査の新しい流れ

著者： 野本裕貴¹ 松本長太¹

所属機関： ¹近畿大学医学部眼科学教室

ページ範囲：P.147 - P.152

　日常診療において視野検査は診断および病状進行の評価を行う際にとても重要な役割を担っている。本稿では，その視野検査の近年の動向を述べたい。

参考文献

1）Fankhauser F, Koch P, Roulier A：On automation of perimetry. Albert Von Grafes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 184：126-150, 1972

2）Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y et al：Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, SITA standard, and SITA fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43：2654-2659, 2002

3）Gardiner SK, Swanson WH, Goren D et al. Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage. Ophthalmology 127：1359-1369, 2014

4）Gardiner SK, Swanson WH, Dermirel S. The effect of limiting the range of perimetric sensitivities on pointwise assessment of visual field progressionin glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57：288-294, 2016

5）Wall M, Kutzko K, Chauhan B：Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V simuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38：426-435, 1997

6）Wall M, Doyle CK, Eden T et al：Size threshold perimetry performs as well as conventional automated perimetry with stimulus sizes Ⅲ, Ⅴ, and Ⅵ for glaucomatous loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54；3975-3983, 2013

7）Gardiner SK, Dermirel S, Goren D et al：The effect of stimulus size on the effective dynamic range of perimetry. Trans Vis Sci Technol 4：10, 2015

8）Asaoka R, Russell R, Malik R et al：A novel distribution of visual field test points to improve the correlation between structure-function measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53：8396-8404, 2012

9）Ehrlich A, Raza A, Ritch R et al：Modifying the conventional visual field test pattern to improve the detection of early glaucomatous defects in the central 10°. Trans Vis Sci Technol 3：6, 2014

10）Chen S, McKendrick AM, Turpin A：Choosing two points to add to the 24-2 pattern to better describe macular visual field damage due to glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 99：1236-1239, 2015

11）Turpin A, Arters PH, McKendrick AM：The Open Perimetry Interface：An enabling tool for clinical visual psychophysics. J Vis 22：1-5, 2012

12）Schiefer U, Schiller J, Paetzold J et al：Evaluation of extensive visual field defects with computer-assisted kinetic perimtry. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 218：13-20, 2001

13）Hashimoto S, Matsumoto C, Okuyama S et al：Development of a new fully automated kinetic algorithm（program K）for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56：2092-2099, 2015

14）Nomoto H, Matsumoto C, Takada S et al：Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT. Journals of glaucoma 18：165-171, 2009

15）江浦真理子・松本長太・橋本茂樹・他：Heidelberg Edge Perimeter（HEP）の使用経験　あたらしい眼科29：1573-1578，2012

16）Ooka E, Mitamura Y, Baba T et al：Foveal microstructure on spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images and visual function after macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 152：283-290, 2011

17）Winterhalter S, Lux A, Maier AK et al：Microperimetry as a routine diagnostic test in the follw-up of retinal vein occlusion ? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250：175-183, 2012

18）Parodi MB, Triolo G, Morales M et al：MP1 and MAIA fundus perimetry in healthy subjects and patients affected by retinal dystrophies. Retina 35：1662-1669, 2015

19）Rao H, Januwada M, Hussain R et al：Comparing the structure-function relationship at the macula with standard automated perimetry and microperimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56：8063-8068, 2015

20）Rossetti L, Diqiuni M, Rosso A et al：Compass：clinical evaluation of a new instrument for the diagnosis of glaucoma. PLoS One 10：e0122157, 2015

21）Matsumoto C, Yamao S, Nomoto H et al：Visual field testing with head-mounted perimeter‘imo’. PLoS One 11：e0161974, 2016

22）Goseki T, Ishikawa H, Shoji N：Bilateral concurrent eye examination with a head-mounted perimeter for diagnosing functional visual loss. Neuro-Ophthalmology：Published online available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01658107.2016.1220593, 2016

23）Murata H, Araie M, Asaoka R：A new approach to measure visual field progression in glaucoma patients using variational Bayes linear regression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55：8386-8392, 2014

24）Zhu H, Crabb DP, Ho T et al：More Accurate modeling of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma：ANSWERS. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56：6077-6083, 2015

25）Marin-Franch I, Malik R, Crabb DP et al：Choice of statistical method influences apparent association between structure and function in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54：4189-4196, 2014

26）Erler NS, Bryan SR, Eilers PHC et al：Optimizing structure-function relationship by maximizing correspondence between glaucomatous visual fields and mathematical retinal fiber models. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55：2350-2357, 2014

27）Rosen P, Boer E, Gracitelli C et al：A portable platform for evaluation of visual performance in glaucoma patients. Plos ONE 10：1-14, 2015

28）Vingrys A, Healey S, Liew S et al：New developments in vision research validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter. Trans Vis Sci Technol 5：4, 2016