臨床眼科73巻13号

2019年12月発行

特集 緑内障の新しい診療法とその評価—ホントのところは？ 【新規検査法を評価する】

新しい眼圧検査—Ocular Response Analyzer（ORA）, Corvis^® ST

著者： 朝岡亮¹

所属機関： ¹東京大学医学部眼科学教室

ページ範囲：P.1484 - P.1491

●ゴールドマン圧平式眼圧計が現在のゴールドスタンダードな眼圧計である。

●Ocular Response AnalyzerやCorvis^® ST眼圧計では，角膜ヒステレシスなどの角膜生体力学的特性を考慮することが可能である。

参考文献

1）Fung YC：Biomechanichs：Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981

2）Roberts CJ：Concepts and misconceptions in corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg 40：862-869, 2014

3）Medeiros FA, Meira-Freitas D, Lisboa R et al：Corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for glaucoma progression：a prospective longitudinal study. Ophthalmology 120：1533-1540, 2013

4）Matsuura M, Hirasawa K, Murata H et al：The usefulness of Corvis ST tonometry and the Ocular response analyzer to assess the progression of glaucoma. Sci Rep. doi：10.1038/srep40798, 2017

5）Hirasawa K, Matsuura M, Murata H et al：Association between corneal biomechanical properties with Ocular response analyzer and also CorvisST tonometry, and glaucomatous visual field severity. Transl Vis Sci Technol. doi：10.1167/tvst.6.3.18, 2017

6）Matsuura M, Hirasawa K, Murata H et al：The relationship between Corvis ST tonometry and Ocular response analyzer measurements in eyes with glaucoma. PLoS One. doi：10.1371/journal.pone.0161742, 2016

7）Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A et al：Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49：3262-3268, 2008

8）Lascaratos G, Garway-Heath DF, Russell RA et al：Intraocular pressure（IOP）measured with the Ocular response analyzer is a better predictor of glaucoma progression than goldmann IOP in the United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study（UKGTS）. e-abstract of Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2014, A0221, 2014

9）Matsuura M, Murata H, Fujino Y et al：Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Br J Ophthalmol. doi：10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314370. 2019

10）Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG et al：Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology 117：730-737, 2010

11）Hirasawa K, Nakakura S, Nakao Y et al：Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. doi：10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.025, 2018

12） Aoki S, Murata H, Nakakura S et al：Development of a novel corneal concavity shape parameter and its association with glaucomatous visual field progression. Ophthalmol glaucoma 2：47-54, 2018

13） Aoki S, Murata H, Nakakura S et al：Correlation between elastic energy stored in an eye and visual field progression in glaucoma. PLoS One. doi：10.1371/journal.pone.0204451, 2018

14）Aoki S, Murata H, Matsuura M et al：The effect of air pulse-driven whole eye motion on the association between corneal hysteresis and glaucomatous visual field progression. Sci Rep. doi：10.1038/s41598-018-21424-8, 2018

15）Matsuura M, Murata H, Fujino Y et al：Repeatability of the novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST. Transl Vis Sci Technol. doi：10.1167/tvst.8.3.48, 2019