1)Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, et al:Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71-74, 1989
2)Stroumbakis N, Cookson MS, Reuter VE, et al:Clinical significance of repeat sextant biopsies in prostate cancer patients. Urology 49:113-118, 1997
3)Rabbani F, Stoumbakis N, Kava BR, et al:Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies. J Urol 159:1247-1250, 1998
4)Stamey TA:Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology 45:2-12, 1995
5)Terris MK, Wallen EM, Stamey:Comparison of mid-lobe versus lateral systematic sextant method for the diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. Urol Int 59:239-242, 1995
6)Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL:Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 157:199-202, 1997
7)Presti JC Jr, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, et al:The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies:Results of a prostective clinical trial. J Urol 163:163-166, 2000
8)Presti JC Jr, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, et al:Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates:Results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol 169:125-129, 2003
9)de la Taille A, Antiphon P, Salomon L, et al:Prostective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 61:1181-1186, 2003