1) Groll RJ, et al : A comprehensive systematic review of testicular germ cell tumor surveillance. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 64 : 182-197, 2007
2) Nayan M, et al : Conditional Risk of Relapse in Surveillance for Clinical Stage I Testicular Cancer. Eur Urol 71 : 120-127, 2017
3) Tandstad T, et al. Management of seminomatous testicular cancer : a binational prospective population-based study from the Swedish norwegian testicular cancer study group. J Clin Oncol 29 : 719-725, 2011
4) Chung P, et al : Evaluation of a prognostic model for risk of relapse in stage I seminoma surveillance. Cancer Med 4 : 155-160, 2015
5) Mortensen MS, et al : A nationwide cohort study of stage I seminoma patients followed on a surveillance program. Eur Urol 66 : 1172-1178, 2014
6) Aparicio J, et al : Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma : a new nomogram derived from three consecutive, risk-adapted studies from the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group (SGCCG). Ann Oncol 25 : 2173-2178, 2014
7) Tandstad T, et al : Treatment of stage I seminoma, with one course of adjuvant carboplatin or surveillance, risk-adapted recommendations implementing patient autonomy : a report from the Swedish and Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group (SWENOTECA). Ann Oncol 27 : 1299-1304, 2016
8) Warde P, et al : Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma managed by surveillance : a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 20 : 4448-4452, 2002
9) Zengerling F, et al : Prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in patients with clinical stage I seminoma undergoing surveillance ― A systematic review. Urol Oncol 36 : 448-458, 2018
10) Boormans JL, et al : Testicular Tumour Size and Rete Testis Invasion as Prognostic Factors for the Risk of Relapse of Clinical Stage I Seminoma Testis Patients Under Surveillance : a Systematic Review by the Testicular Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 73 : 394-405, 2018
11) Mead GM, et al : The International Germ Cell Consensus Classification : a new prognostic factor-based staging classification for metastatic germ cell tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 9 : 207-209, 1997
12) Beyer J, et al : Survival and New Prognosticators in Metastatic Seminoma : Results From the IGCCCG-Update Consortium. J Clin Oncol 39 : 1553-1562, 2021
13) De Santis M, et al : 2-18fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is a reliable predictor for viable tumor in postchemotherapy seminoma : an update of the prospective multicentric SEMPET trial. J Clin Oncol 22 : 1034-1039, 2004
fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for postchemotherapy seminoma residual lesions : a retrospective validation of the SEMPET trial. Ann Oncol 23 : 59-64, 2012
15) Cathomas R, et al : Questioning the Value of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Residual Lesions After Chemotherapy for Metastatic Seminoma : Results of an International Global Germ Cell Cancer Group Registry. J Clin Oncol 36 : JCO1800210, 2018
16) Herr HW, et al : Surgery for a post-chemotherapy residual mass in seminoma. J Urol 157 : 860-862, 1997
17) Mosharafa AA, et al : Is post-chemotherapy resection of seminomatous elements associated with higher acute morbidity? J Urol 169 : 2126-2128, 2003
18) Puc HS, et al : Management of residual mass in advanced seminoma : results and recommendations from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. J Clin Oncol 14 : 454-460, 1996