1) Swart P, Beurden M, Mol BWJ, et al : The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology : a meta─analysis. Fertil Steril 61 : 470-477, 1994
2) Hiroi H, Fujiwara T, Nakazawa M, et al : High incidence of tubal dysfunction is determined by laparoscopy in cases with positive Chlamydia trachomatis antibody despite negative finding in prior hysterosalpingography. Reprod Med Biol 6 : 39─43, 2007
3) Strandell A, Bourne T, Bergh C, et al : The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency : a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X─ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14 : 200─204, 1999
4) Reis MM, Soares SR, Cancado ML, et al : Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography(HyCoSy)with SH U 454(Echovist)for the assessment of tubal pregnancy. Human Reprod 13 : 3049─52, 1998
5) Dietrich M, Suren A, Hinney B, et al : Evaluation of tubal patency by hysterocontrast sonography(HyCoSy, Echovist)and its correlation with laparoscopic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 24 : 523─527, 1996
6) Degenhardt F, Jibril S, Eisenhauer B, et al : Hysterosalpingo─contrast sonography(HyCoSy)for determining tubal patency. Clin Radiol 51(Suppl 1) : 15─8, 1996
7) Dijikman AB, Mol BWJ, Veen F, et al : Can hysterosalpingocontrast─sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility? Eur J Radiol 35 : 44─48, 2000