臨床婦人科産科63巻9号

2009年09月発行

今月の臨床 婦人科がん検診 【子宮頸がん検診】

3.子宮頸部細胞診の液状検体の利点と問題点

著者： 林由梨¹ 浅尾有紀¹ 根津幸穂¹ 今野良¹

所属機関： ¹自治医科大学附属さいたま医療センター産科婦人科

ページ範囲：P.1128 - P.1133

はじめに

　液状細胞診（liquid based cytology : LBC）は1990年代半ばに開発されて以来，進化した細胞診の手法と注目されているが，わが国ではまだなじみの薄い手法である．今回LBCの利点，問題点を挙げることにより今後の細胞診のあり方を再検討する．

参考文献

1） 子宮頸がん検診とヒトパピローマウイルスQuestions & Answers集2009. 3. 27．（案）日本細胞診断学推進協会http://ns2.jscc.gr.jp/senmon/pdf/3_27.pdf

2） ACOG Practice Bulletin : clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 61, April 2005. Human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol 105 : 905─918, 2005

3） Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, et al : Utility of Liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening : results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Cancer 87 : 48─55, 1999

4） Clavel C, Masure M, Bory JP, et al : Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions : a study of 7932 women. Br J Cancer 84 : 1616─1623, 2001

5） Klinkhamer PJ, Meerding WJ, Rosier PF, et al : Liquid-based cervical cytology : a review of the literature with methods of evidence-based medicine. Cancer（Cancer Cytopathol）99 : 263─172, 2003

6） Davey E, Barrat A, Irwig L, et al : Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology : a systemic review. Lancet 367 : 122─132, 2006

7） Coste J, Cochand-Priollet B, de Cremoux P, et al : Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening. BMJ 326 : 733─737, 2003

8） Ferenczy A, Robitaille J, Franco E, et al : Conventional cervical cytology vs ThinPrep smears. Acta Cytol 40 : 1136─1142, 1996

9） Bergeron C, Bishop J, Lemarie A, et al : Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy. Acta Cytol 45 : 519─524, 2001

10） Sherman ME, Mendoza M, Lee KR, et al : Performance of liquid-based, thin-layer cervical cytology : correlation with reference diagnoses and human papillomavirus testing. Mod Pathol 11 : 837─843, 1998

11） Hessling JJ, Raso DS, Schiffer B, et al : Effectiveness of thin-layer preparation vs conventional Pap smear in a blinded, split-sample study : extended cytologic evaluation. J Reprod Med 46 : 880─886, 2001

12） Strander B, Andersson-Ellstrom A, Milsom I, et al : Liquid-based cytology versus conventional papanicolaou smear in an organized screening system program : a prospective randomized study. Cancer（Cancer Cytopathol）111 : 285─291, 2007

13） Schledermann D, Ejersbo D, Hoelund B : Improvement of diagnostic accuracy and screening conditions with liquid-based cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 34 : 780─785, 2006

14） Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Klinkhamer P, et al : Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology : A systemic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 111 : 167─177, 2008

15） 齋藤深雪，長島義男 : 8．病理・細胞診検査機器 10）細胞診自動塗抹装置Medical Technology 34 : 1622─1625，2006

16） McGoogan E, Reith A : Would monolayers provide more representative samples and improved preparations for cervical screening? Overview and evaluation of systems available. Acta Cytol 40 : 107─119, 1996

17） Dowie R, Stoykova B, Crawford D, et al : Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers : evidence from timing surveys in two NHS52 cytology laboratories. Cytopathol 17 : 65─72, 2006

18） Ronco G, Cuzick J, Pierotti P, et al : Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology : overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening : randomized controlled trial. BMJ 335 : 1─2, 2007

19） Doyle B, O’ Farrell C, Mahoney E, et al : Liquid-based cytology improves productivity in cervical cytology screening. Cytopathol 17 : 60─64, 2006

20） Williams AR : Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-months periods. Cytopathol 17 : 82─85, 2006

21） Ronco G, Segnan N, Giorge-Rossi P, et al : Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology : results at recruitment from the new technologies for cervical cancer randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 98 : 765─774, 2006

22） Kirschner B, Simonsen K, Junge J. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer. Cytopathol 17 : 187─194, 2006

23） D. Solomon, R. Nayer : ベセスダシステム2001アトラス．pp4─7，シュプリンガー・ジャパン，2001

24） 中村　博，古谷津純一，石和　久 : Thinlayer法とその見方．Medical Technology 33 : 293─298, 2005

25） HPV and Cervical Cancer in the World 2007 Report. Vaccine 25 : S3, 2007

26） OECD Health Data 2007 : http://www.ecosante.fr/index2

27） Chung HH, Kim JW, Kang SB : Cost is a barrier to widespread use of liquid-based cytology for cervical screening in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 21 : 1054─1059, 2006

28） 林　由梨，川島　恵，今野　良，他 : 子宮頸がん検診の現状と課題．産婦の実際58 : 507─518，2009

29） van Ballegooijen M, a, van den Akker-van Marle Ea, J. Patnick, et al : Overview of important cervical cancer screening process values in EU countries, and tentative predictions of the corresponding effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. European Journal of Cancer 36 : 2177─2188, 2000

30） Myers ER, McCrory DC, Kavita N, et al : Mathematical model for the Natural History of human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Carcinogenesis. Am J Epidemiol 151 : 1158─1171, 2000

31） Cervical Cancer Screening : IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention Vol.10. pp61, IARC Press, Lyon, 2005