臨床婦人科産科71巻3号

2017年04月発行

今月の臨床 婦人科がん低侵襲治療の現状と展望〈特別付録web動画〉

子宮頸がん

腹腔鏡下広汎子宮全摘術

著者： 小林栄仁¹ 木村正¹

所属機関： ¹大阪大学医学部産婦人科

ページ範囲：P.302 - P.311

文献概要

●LRHは本邦で先進医療制度のもと，多くの施設で導入されつつある．

●本邦の優れた術者が築いてきた開腹の治療成績に劣らない術式にするためには，普遍的な手術手技の改良，多数例での手術成績の解析および合併症を含めた臨床情報の共有が不可欠で，それに基づく保険収載が今後の課題である．

参考文献

1）Lanowska, et al : Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy（VALRH） versus laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy （LARVH） in the treatment of cervical cancer : surgical results and oncologic outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289 : 1293─1300, 2014

2）Schauta F : Die erweiterte vaginale Totalexstirpation des Uterus beim Kollumkarzinom. Verlag von J. Safar, Wien, 1908

3）Stoeckel W : Zur Technik der vaginalen Radikaloperation beim Kollumkarzinom. Zentralbl Gynakol 55 : 53─64, 1931

4）Gottschalk E, et al : Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy : rationale, technique, results. JSLS 15 : 451─459, 2011

5）Nazhat CR, et al : Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecology 166 : 864─865, 1992

6）小林栄仁，他 : 子宮頸がんに対する腹腔鏡下広汎子宮全摘術の現状　過去の報告からの検討．産婦の実際65 : 133─140, 2016

7）NM Spirtos, et al : Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy（type III） with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer : surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecology 187 : 340─348, 2002

8）Obermair A, et al : Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10 : 345─349, 2003

9）Pomel C, et al : Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer : 8-year experience of pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 91 : 534─539, 2003

10）Gil-Moreno A, et al : Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy（type II-III） with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12 : 113─120, 2005

11）Ghezzi F, et al : Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy. Gynecol oncol 106 : 502─506, 2007

12）Puntambekar SP, et al : Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by Pune technique : our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14 : 682─689, 2007

13）Li G, et al : A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 105 : 176─180, 2007

14）Frumovitz M, et al : Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 110 : 96─102, 2007

15）Nezhat FR, et al : Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 12 : 227─237, 2008

16）Chen Y, et al : The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer : a prospective analysis of 295 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 15 : 2847─2855, 2008

17）Sobiczewski P, et al : Early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy and conventional surgery : comparison of treatment results. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19 : 1390─1395, 2009

18）Pellegrino A, et al : Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer : analysis of surgical and oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 35 : 98─103, 2009

19）Malzoni M, et al : Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer : our experience. Ann Surg Oncol 16 : 1316─1323, 2009

20）Canton-Romero JC, et al : Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with the use of a modified uterine manipulator for the management of stage IB1 cervix cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol 30 : 49─52, 2010

21）Kavallaris A, et al : Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy : description of the technique and patients outcome. Gynecol Oncol 119 : 198─201, 2010

22）Lee EJ, et al : A comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer : a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 156 : 83─86, 2011

23）Simsek T, et al : Laparoscopic surgery compared to traditional abdominal surgery in the management of early stage cervical cancer. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 33 : 395─398, 2012

24）Park NY, et al : On Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer : long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21 : 355─362, 2011

25）Yan X, et al : Twelve-year experience with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 120 : 362─367, 2011

26）Hwang JH, et al : Learning curve analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymph node dissection in early cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repro Biol 163 : 219─223, 2012

27）Hong JH, et al : Can laparoscopic radical hystetrectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 127 : 202─206, 2012

28）Choi CH, et al : Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19 : 3839─3848, 2012

29）Pareja R, et al : Quality of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in developing countries : a comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between a comprehensive cancer center in the United States and a cancer center in Colombia. Gynecol Oncol 125 : 326─329, 2012

30）Nam JH, et al : Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer : long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol 23 : 903─911, 2012

31）Chen CH, et al : Comparing thermal welding instrument-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in the management of FIGO IB1 squamous cell cervical carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 34 : 442─445, 2013

32）Kong TW, et al : Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3cm or greater. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24 : 280─288, 2014

33）Yin XH, et al : Clinical observation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med 7 : 1373─1377, 2014

34）Yang L, et al : Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy can be routinely used for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer : a single-institute experience with 404 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22 : 199─204, 2015

35）Chiantera V, et al : Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer as total mesometrial resection（L-TMMR） : a multicenteric experience. Gynecol Oncol 139 : 47─51, 2015

36）Ditto A, et al : Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy : a comparison with open surgical operations. Eur J Surg Oncol 41 : 34─39, 2015

37）Wang Wet al : Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer : A Matched Cohort Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26 : 1254─1273, 2016

38）Laterza RM, et al : Recurrence of Early Stage Cervical Cancer After Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26 : 547─552, 2016

39）Mendivil AA, et al : Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy : A five year experience. Surg Oncol 25 : 66─71, 2016

40）Hwang JH, et al : Urologic complication in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy : meta-analysis of 20 studies. Eur J Cancer 48 : 3177─3185, 2012

41）Johnson N, et al : Methods of hysterectomy : systemic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 330 : 1478, 2005

42）Kobayashi E, et al : Utility of an Internal Retractor（EndoGrab） for the Management of the Vesicouterine Ligament during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 81 : 363─366, 2016

43）Stefano U, et al : A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy to open abdominal surgery. Gynecol Oncol 107 : 147─149, 2007

44）Chong GO, et al : Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer : comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19 : 1459─1464, 2009