1)Chan YY, et al : The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in selected and high-risk populations : a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17 : 761─771, 2011
2)The American Fertility Society : The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49 : 944─955, 1988
3)Acien P : Incidence of Müllerian defects infertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 12 : 1372─1376, 1997
4)Woelfer B, et al : Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Hum Reprod 98 : 1099─1103, 2001
5)Grimbizis GF, et al : The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod 28 : 2032─2044, 2013
6)杉浦真弓 : エビデンスに基づいた不育症・習慣流産の診療.金芳堂,2017
7)Sugiura-Ogasawara M, et al : Uterine anomaly and recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med 29 : 514─521, 2011
8)Sugiura-Ogasawara M, et al : Müllerian anomalies and recurrent miscarriage. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 25 : 293─298, 2013
9)Sugiura-Ogasawara M, et al : Midline uterine defect size correlated with miscarriage of euploid embryos in recurrent cases. Fertil Steril 93 : 1983─1988, 2010
10)Sugiura-Ogasawara M, et al : Does surgery improve live birth rates in patients with recurrent miscarriage caused by uterine anomalies? J Obstet Gynaecol 35 : 155─158, 2015
11)Hua M, et al : Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205 : 558. e1─5, 2011
12)Nahum GG : Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. The 20th-century worldwide experience of 588 cases. J Reprod Med 47 : 151─163, 2002