1)Roque M, et al : Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles : a systemic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 99 : 156-162, 2013
2)Rinaldi L, et al : Endometrial thickness as a predictorof pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization but not after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 11 : 1538-1541, 1996
3)Geyter CD, et al : Prospective evaluation of the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium in a cohort of 1,186 infertile women. Fertil Steril 73 : 106-113, 2000
4)Diaz-Gimeno, et al : A genomic diagnosis tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril 95 : 50-60, 2011
5)Shapiro BS, et al : Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization : a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 96 : 344-348, 2011
6)Givens CR, et al : Outcomes of natural cycles versus programmed cycles for 1677 frozen thawed embryo transfers. Reprod Biomed Online 19 : 380-384, 2009
7)Ruiz Alonso M, et al : The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 100 : 818-824, 2013
8)Simon C, et al : Prize PaperASRM Annual Meeting 2016
9)Olesen MS, et al : Therapeutic endometrial scratching and implantation after in vitro fertilization : a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 112 : 1015-1021, 2019
10)Saito K, et al : Endometrial preparation methods for frozen-thawed embryo transfer are associated with altered risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, placenta accreta, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Hum Reprod 34 : 1567-1575, 2019