臨床婦人科産科75巻5号

2021年05月発行

今月の臨床 頸管熟化と子宮収縮の徹底理解！―安全な分娩誘発・計画分娩のために 分娩誘発の合併症

分娩誘発の母体・胎児に対する短期・長期リスク

著者： 鈴木俊治¹

所属機関： ¹葛飾赤十字産院産婦人科

ページ範囲：P.449 - P.455

●分娩誘発は，母児の医学的・社会的予後が良好になることを目的とする．

●妊娠の継続が母児いずれかのリスクにつながる場合は，状況に応じたタイミングで分娩誘発する．

●妊娠の継続が母児のリスクにつながらない社会的適応を含めた分娩誘発のタイミングは，最も周産期予後が良好な妊娠39〜40週を念頭において考慮する．

参考文献

1）日本産科婦人科学会，他（編） : CQ405　社会的適応による分娩誘発を行う際の留意点は？　産婦人科診療ガイドライン―産科編2020．pp204-205，日本産科婦人科学会，2020

2）Grobman WA, et al : Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 379 : 513-523, 2018

3）Sotiriadis A, et al : Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy : a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 53 : 26-35, 2019

4）Werner EF, et al : Association of term labor induction vs expectant management with child academic outcomes. JAMA Netw Open 3 : e202503, 2020

5）Bernardes TP, et al : Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix : a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials. BJOG 123 : 1501-1508, 2016

6）Darney BG, et al : Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management : maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 122 : 761-769, 2013

7）Na ED, et al : Pregnancy outcomes of elective induction in low-risk term pregnancies : a propensity-score analysis. Medicine（Baltimore） 98 : e14284, 2019

8）Bentley JP, et al : Planned birth before 39 weeks and child development : a population-based study. Pediatrics 138 : e20162002, 2016

9）日本産科婦人科学会，他（編） : CQ409　妊娠41週以降妊婦の取り扱いは？　産婦人科診療ガイドライン―産科編2020．pp220-222，日本産科婦人科学会，2020

10）Suzuki S : Post-term pregnancy as a risk factor for intrapartum fetal distress. J Perinat Med 37 : 420-421, 2009

11）Klefstad OA, et al : A more liberal approach towards induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy does not result in an adverse labour outcome. Dan Med J 61 : A4913, 2014

12）Mya KS, et al : Management of pregnancy at and beyond 41 completed weeks of gestation in low-risk women : a secondary analysis of two WHO multi-country surveys on maternal and newborn health. Reprod Health 14 : 141, 2017

13）Wennerholm UB, et al : Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks（SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS） : multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial. BMJ 367 : l6131, 2019

14）日本産科婦人科学会，他（編） : CQ303　前期破水の取り扱いは？ 産婦人科診療ガイドライン―産科編2020．pp142-146，日本産科婦人科学会，2020

15）Hannah ME, et al : Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. N Engl J Med 334 : 1005-1010, 1996

16）Middleton P, et al : Planned early birth versus expectant management（waiting） for prelabour rupture of membranes at term（37 weeks or more）．Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 : CD005302, 2017

17）日本産科婦人科学会，他（編） : CQ310　巨大児（推定体重4,000g以上）が疑われる妊婦への対応は？　産婦人科診療ガイドライン―産科編2020．pp181-185，日本産科婦人科学会，2020

18）日本産科婦人科学会，他（編） : CQ310　巨大児（推定体重4,000g以上）が疑われる症例の取り扱いは？　産婦人科診療ガイドライン―産科編2014．pp178-181，日本産科婦人科学会，2014

19）Boulvain M, et al : Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses : a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385 : 2600-2605, 2015

20）Suzuki S : Fetal macrosomia : induction of labour or expectant management? Lancet 386 : 1629, 2015

21）Ibiebele I, et al : Childhood health and education outcomes following early term induction for large-for-gestational age : a population-based record linkage study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98 : 423-432, 2019

22）Moldéus K, et al : Induction of labor versus expectant management of large-for-gestational-age infants in nulliparous women. PLoS One 12 : e0180748, 2017

23）Boulvain M, et al : Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 : CD000938, 2016

24）Lee VR, et al : Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women : retrospective cohort study. BJOG 123 : 271-278, 2016

25）Pickens CMG, et al : Term elective induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes among obese women and their offspring. Obstet Gynecol 131 : 12-22, 2018

26）Palatnik A, et al : Outcomes of elective induction of labor versus expectant management among obese women at ≥39 weeks. Am J Perinatol 37 : 695-707, 2020

27）Jacobsson B, at al. : Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 104 : 727-733, 2004

28）Walker KF, et al : Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 years of age or older. N Engl J Med 374 : 813-822, 2016

29）Knight HE, et al : Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over : An English national cohort study. PLoS Med 14 : e1002425, 2017

30）日本産科婦人科学会，他（編） : CQ309-2　妊娠高血圧症候群と診断されたら？　産婦人科診療ガイドライン―産科編2020．pp172-176，日本産科婦人科学会，2020

31）日本産科婦人科学会，他（編） : CQ309-1　妊娠高血圧腎症の診断と取り扱いは？　産婦人科診療ガイドライン―産科編2014．pp168-172，日本産科婦人科学会，2014

32）Koopmans CM, et al : Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation（HYPITAT）: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374 : 979-988, 2009

33）Broekhuijsen K, et al : Immediate delivery versus expectant monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation（HYPITAT-II） : an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385 : 2492-2501, 2015

34）Cluver C, et al : Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 : CD009273, 2017

35）American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins―Obstetrics : Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia : ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol 135 : e237-e260, 2020