icon fsr

文献詳細

雑誌文献

胃と腸57巻10号

2022年09月発行

文献概要

今月の主題 大腸腫瘍診療の最前線 主題

大腸外科治療の最前線

著者: 古来貴寛1 浜部敦史2 石井雅之1 沖田憲司1 奥谷浩一1 秋月恵美1 佐藤雄3 三代雅明1 三浦亮1 市原もも子1 竹政伊知朗1

所属機関: 1札幌医科大学消化器・総合,乳腺・内分泌外科学講座 2大阪大学大学院医学系研究科外科学講座消化器外科学 3東邦大学医療センター佐倉病院外科

ページ範囲:P.1341 - P.1348

文献購入ページに移動
要旨●大腸外科治療において腹腔鏡手術を中心としたMIS(minimally invasive surgery)の概念が普及しているが,本邦が目指す「Society 5.0」ではdigital surgeryの時代が到来すると考えられており,今はその移行期にある.roboticsやenhanced visualization,ICT(information and communication technology)の活用による遠隔医療や人工知能(AI)によるビッグデータの解析と,これらすべての情報統合(connectivity)により実現するdigital surgeryは,従来の“population medicine”から,個人の遺伝素因・環境要因などに合わせた医療“precision medicine”を可能とするだろう.本稿では,腹腔鏡手術からdigital surgery時代への移行期におけるロボット支援下大腸手術,ICG(indocyanine green)を用いた近赤外光ガイド下手術,遠隔医療を中心に大腸外科治療の最前線について述べる.

参考文献

1)Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209-249, 2021
2)Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery:146 cases. World J Surg 25:1467-1477, 2001
3)Marubashi S, Takahashi A, Kakeji Y, et al. Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan:Report of the National Clinical Database 2011-2019. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 5:639-658, 2021
4)Shiroshita H, Inomata M, Akira S, et al. Current status of endoscopic surgery in Japan:The 15th National Survey of Endoscopic Surgery by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg 15:415-426, 2022
5)Matsuyama T, Endo H, Yamamoto H, et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer:propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan. BJS Open 5:zrab083, 2021
6)Fleming CA, Cullinane C, Lynch N, et al. Urogenital function following robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery:meta-analysis. Br J Surg 108:128-137, 2021
7)Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer:A phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267:243-251, 2018
8)Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer:The ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569-1580, 2017
9)Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, et al. Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection:Long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60:266-273, 2017
10)Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer:results of a single high-volume center in Japan. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1755-1762, 2018
11)UMIN.進行直腸癌に対するロボット支援下直腸切除術の腫瘍学的妥当性に関する多施設共同,前向きregistry研究.2020 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/ishi/20/index.html(2022年7月13日閲覧)
12)Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al. Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer:use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 29:1679-1685, 2015
13)Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, Rubio-Dorado-Manzanares M, Díaz-Pavón JM, et al. Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery:current state of affairs. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1807-1815, 2016
14)Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701-1708, 2007
15)Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V, et al. Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery:an institutional experience. Surg Endosc 26:956-963, 2012
16)Gasillas Jr MA, Leichtle SW, Wahl WL, et al. Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations. Am J Surg 208:33-40, 2014
17)Ngu JCY, Ng YYR. Robotics confers an advantage in right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis when matched against conventional laparoscopy. J Robot Surg 12:647-653, 2018
18)Park JS, Kang H, Park SY, et al. Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy:a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 33:2975-2981, 2019
19)Cuk P, Kjaer MD, Mogensen CB, et al. Short-term outcomes in robot-assisted compared to laparoscopic colon cancer resections:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 36:32-46, 2022
20)JRCT.切除可能結腸癌に対するロボット支援下結腸切除術の安全性に関する検討ー多施設共同,前向き,ヒストリカルコントロール,feasibility研究.https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1032190036(2022年7月13日閲覧)
21)Krarup PM, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Jorgensen LN, et al. Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer:a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg 259:930-938, 2014
22)Watanabe J, Ishibe A, Suwa Y, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer:a propensity score-matched cohort study. Surg Endosc 34:202-208, 2020
23)Yanagita T, Hara M, Osaga S, et al. Efficacy of intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging evaluation for preventing anastomotic leakage after left-sided colon or rectal cancer surgery:a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 35:2373-2385, 2021
24)Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:569-576, 2009
25)Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE, et al. Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection(PILLAR II):a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220:82-92, 2015
26)Ishii M, Hamabe A, Okita K, et al. Efficacy of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in preventing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 35:269-275, 2020
27)Jafari MD, Pigazzi A, McLemore EC, et al. Perfusion assessment in left-sided/low anterior resection(PILLAR III):A randomized, controlled, parallel, multicenter study assessing perfusion outcomes with PINPOINT near-infrared fluorescence imaging in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 64:995-1002, 2021
28)UMIN.腹腔鏡下直腸癌手術後の縫合不全予防に対する近赤外光観察を用いた腸管血流評価の有効性に関するランダム化比較試験. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&action=brows&recptno=R000034540&type=summary&language=J(2022年7月13日閲覧)
29)ISCRN registry.IntAct- IFA to prevent anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13334746?q=13334746&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10(2022年7月13日閲覧)
30)Satoyoshi T, Okita K, Ishii M, et al. Timing of indocyanine green injection prior to laparoscopic colorectal surgery for tumor localization:a prospective case series. Surg Endosc 35:763-769, 2021
31)石井雅之,佐藤雄,竹政伊知朗.蛍光ガイド下大腸癌手術は本当に有用か.臨外77:152-160, 2022
32)Sato Y, Satoyoshi T, Okita K, et al. Snapshots of lymphatic pathways in colorectal cancer surgery using near-infrared fluorescence, in vivo and ex vivo. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:3130-3136, 2021
33)厚生労働省.令和2年(2020年)医師・歯科医師・薬剤師統計の概況. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/ishi/20/index.html(2022年7月13日閲覧)
34)Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14(CONCORD-3):analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet 391:1023-1075, 2018
35)Ward ZJ, Scott AM, Hricak H, et al. Estimating the impact of treatment and imaging modalities on 5-year net survival of 11 cancers in 200 countries:a simulation-based analysis. Lancet Oncol 21:1077-1088, 2020
36)Hakamada K, Mori M. The changing surgical scene:From the days of Billroth to the upcoming future of artificial intelligence and telerobotic surgery. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 29:268-269, 2021
37)OECD. health Statistics 2022. https://www.oecd.org/health/health-data.html(2022年7月13日閲覧)
38)United Nations. The 17 Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals(2022年7月13日閲覧)

掲載誌情報

出版社:株式会社医学書院

電子版ISSN:1882-1219

印刷版ISSN:0536-2180

雑誌購入ページに移動
icon up
あなたは医療従事者ですか?