臨床整形外科58巻2号

2023年02月発行

特集 外反母趾診療ガイドライン改訂　外反母趾治療のトレンドを知る

外反母趾の疫学，病態，診断

著者： 窪田誠¹

所属機関： ¹東京慈恵会医科大学葛飾医療センター整形外科

ページ範囲：P.137 - P.143

外反母趾の疫学，病態，診断について概説した．外反母趾は非常に有病率が高く，65歳以上では，全体で30〜40％，女性では35〜50％，男性でも20％程度とされている．近年，外反母趾に関する3次元的な病態の解明が進み，第1足根中足関節でのhypermobility，第1中足骨頭の回旋，種子骨の外側偏位などが特に注目されている．評価法は，本邦ではJSSFスケール，SAFE-Qが広く用いられている．臨床の現場では，これらの基本的事項について外反母趾患者に正しく伝える必要がある．

参考文献

1) 日本整形外科学会，日本足の外科学会(監修)．日本整形外科学会診療ガイドライン委員会，外反母趾診療ガイドライン策定委員会(編)．外反母趾診療ガイドライン2022．改訂第3版．東京：南光堂；2022．

2) Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population:a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 2010;3:21. doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-21.

3) Hannan MT, Menz HB, Jordan JM, et al. High heritability of hallux valgus and lesser toe deformities in adult men and women. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013;65(9):1515-21.

4) González-Martín C, Alonso-Tajes F, Pérez-García S, et al. Hallux valgus in a random population in Spain and its impact on quality of life and functionality. Rheumatol Int 2017;37(11):1899-907.

5) Luo XD, Xue CH, Li Y. Study on the foot shape characteristics of the elderly in China. Foot (Edinb) 2017;33:68-75.

6) Nishimura A, Fukuda A, Nakazora S, et al. Prevalence of hallux valgus and risk factors among Japanese community dwellers. J Orthop Sci 2014;19(2):257-62.

7) 弓岡まみ，村田　伸，岩瀬弘明・他．高齢者の足部・足趾の形態と形態異常に関する調査研究．ヘルスプロモーション理療研2017；7(2)：79-83．

8) 櫻井寿美，木村みさか，岡山寧子・他．地域在住高齢者における第一趾側角度．靴の医学2013；27(2)：97-100．

9) Cho NH, Kim S, Kwon DJ, et al. The prevalence of hallux valgus and its association with foot pain and function in a rural Korean community. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91(4):494-8.

10) Okuda H, Juman S, Ueda A, et al. Factors related to prevalence of hallux valgus in female university students:a cross-sectional study. J Epidemiol 2014;24(3):200-8.

11) Nery C, Coughlin MJ, Baumfeld D, et al. Hallux valgus in males-part 1:demographics, etiology, and comparative radiology. Foot Ankle Int 2013;34(5):629-35.

12) Menz HB, Roddy E, Marshall M, et al. Epidemiology of shoe wearing patterns over time in older women:associations with foot pain and hallux valgus. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2016;71(12):1682-7.

13) Kilmartin TE, Barrington RL, Wallace WA. A controlled prospective trial of a foot orthosis for juvenile hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76(2):210-4.

14) Sung KH, Kwon SS, Park MS, et al. Natural progression of radiographic indices in juvenile hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Surg 2019;25(3):378-82.

15) Lee SY, Chung CY, Park MS, et al. Radiographic measurements associated with the natural progression of the hallux valgus during at least 2 years of follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 2018;39(4):463-70.

16) Koo KK, Tse LF, Cheng HS, et al. The progression of hallux valgus in the oriental Chinese population in Hong Kong. Foot (Edinb) 2017;32:15-21.

17) Young KW, Park YU, Kim JS, et al. Unilateral hallux valgus:is it true unilaterality, or does it progress to bilateral deformity? Foot Ankle Int 2013;34(4):498-503.

18) Meyr AJ, Myers A, Pontious J. Descriptive quantitative analysis of hallux abductovalgus transverse plane radiographic parameters. J Foot Ankle Surg 2014;53(4):397-404.

19) Grebing BR, Coughlin MJ. The effect of ankle position on the exam for first ray mobility. Foot Ankle Int 2004;25(7):467-75.

20) Rush SM, Christensen JC, Johnson CH. Biomechanics of the first ray. Part II:Metatarsus primus varus as a cause of hypermobility. A three-dimensional kinematic analysis in a cadaver model. J Foot Ankle Surg 2000;39(2):68-77.

21) Kimura T, Kubota M, Taguchi T, et al. Evaluation of first-ray mobility in patients with hallux valgus using weight-bearing CT and a 3-D analysis system a comparison with normal feet. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017;99:247-55.

22) Geng X, Wang C, Ma X, et al. Mobility of the first metatarsal-cuneiform joint in patients with and without hallux valgus:in vivo three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography scan. J Orthop Surg Res 2015;10:140. doi:10.1186/s13018-015-0289-2.

23) Kimura T, Kubota M, Suzuki N, et al. Comparison of intercuneiform 1-2 joint mobility between hallux valgus and normal feet using weightbearing computed tomography and 3-dimensional analysis. Foot Ankle Int 2018;39(3):355-60.

24) Campbell B, Miller MC, Williams L, et al. Pilot study of a 3-dimensional method for analysis of pronation of the first metatarsal of hallux valgus patients. Foot Ankle Int 2018;39(12):1449-56.

25) Kim Y, Kim JS, Young KW, et al. A new measure of tibial sesamoid position in hallux valgus in relation to the coronal rotation of the first metatarsal in CT scans. Foot Ankle Int 2015;36(8):944-52.

26) Ota T, Nagura T, Kokubo T, et al. Etiological factors in hallux valgus, a three-dimensional analysis of the first metatarsal. J Foot Ankle Res 2017;10:43. doi:10.1186/s13047-017-0226-1.

27) 丸山和典，倉　秀治，内山英一．重度外反母趾の第1中足骨の捻れに関する検討　CTによる評価．日足の外科会誌2017；38：42-5．

28) Katsui R, Samoto N, Taniguchi A, et al. Relationship between displacement and degenerative changes of the sesamoids in hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 2016;37(12):1303-9.

29) Okuda R, Kinoshita M, Yasuda T, et al. The shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head as a risk factor for recurrence of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89(10):2163-72.

30) Galica AM, Hagedorn TJ, Dufour AB, et al. Hallux valgus and plantar pressure loading:the Framingham foot study. J Foot Ankle Res 2013;6(1):42. doi:10.1186/1757-1146-6-42.

31) Koller U, Willegger M, Windhager R, et al. Plantar pressure characteristics in hallux valgus feet. J Orthop Res 2014;32(12):1688-93.

32) Hida T, Okuda R, Yasuda T, et al. Comparison of plantar pressure distribution in patients with hallux valgus and healthy matched controls. J Orthop Sci 2017;22(6):1054-9.

33) Slullitel G, López V, Calvi JP, et al. Effect of first ray insufficiency and metatarsal index on metatarsalgia in hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 2016;37(3):300-6.

34) Gribbin CK, Ellis SJ, Nguyen J, et al. Relationship of radiographic and clinical parameters with hallux valgus and second ray pathology. Foot Ankle Int 2017;38(1):14-9.

35) Kokubo T, Hashimoto T, Suda Y, et al. Radiographic shape of foot with second metatarsophalangeal joint dislocation associated with hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 2017;38(12):1374-9.

36) 田辺理恵，関　広幸，須田康文・他．外反母趾患者の歩行分析　立脚終期に着目して．日足の外科会誌2018；39(1)：158-62．

37) 西村明展，中空繁登，加藤　公・他．高齢者外反母趾は年齢・性別と独立して運動機能低下に影響する．日足の外科会誌2015；36(1)：29-32．

38) Cho NH, Kim S, Kwon DJ, et al. The prevalence of hallux valgus and its association with foot pain and function in a rural Korean community. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91(4):494-8.

39) Nishimura A, Fukuda A, Nakazora S, et al. Prevalence of hallux valgus and risk factors among Japanese community dwellers. J Orthop Sci 2014;19(2):257-62.

40) Golightly YM, Hannan MT, Dufour AB, et al. Factors associated with hallux valgus in a community-based cross-sectional study of adults with and without osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67(6):791-8.

41) Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus in men:effect of the distal metatarsal articular angle on hallux valgus correction. Foot Ankle Int 1997;18(8):463-70.

42) Hardy RH, Clapham JC. Observations on hallux valgus:based on a controlled series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1951;33B(3):376-91.

43) Munuera PV, Dominguez G, Polo J, et al. Medial deviation of the first metatarsal in incipient hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Int 2006;27(12):1030-5.

44) Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, et al. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I:development of standard rating system. J Orthop Sci 2005;10(5):457-65.

45) Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, et al. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders II:interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese orthopaedic association rating scale. J Orthop Sci 2005;10(5):466-74.

46) Niki H, Tatsunami S, Haraguchi N, et al. Validity and reliability of a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q). J Orthop Sci 2013;18(2):298-320.