文献詳細
文献概要
特集 脳機能回復と理学療法
脳機能回復とConstraint-Induced Movement Therapy(CIMT)
著者: 村山尊司1
所属機関: 1千葉県千葉リハビリテーションセンター
ページ範囲:P.803 - P.811
文献購入ページに移動はじめに
近年,神経科学分野において,機能的MRI(functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging:fMRI)や,近赤外分光法(Near Infrared Spectoroscopy:NIRS),経頭蓋磁気刺激(Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation:TMS)などの神経の活動を可視化するニューロイメージング技術の発展により,脳損傷後に脳の可塑的変化や脳機能の再構築が起きることが明らかにされた.脳卒中や脳外傷などの脳損傷者の運動機能,認知機能の回復機序について多くの知見が蓄積され,リハビリテーション分野の発展に大きく貢献した.
ニューロイメージングの発展を背景に,損傷後の神経機能回復促進を目的としたニューロリハビリテーションという概念が提唱されるようになった.電気刺激などで末梢器官から中枢神経系へ働きかけたり,麻痺肢を随意的に積極的に動かしたりすることで,脳の可塑的変化や神経ネットワークの再構築を促す治療である.
ニューロリハビリテーションのなかで最も多くの知見が示されている治療法の一つが,CI療法(Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy:CIMT)であろう.CIMTは,非麻痺側肢の使用を制限しながら麻痺肢に対する段階的な集中トレーニングと,日常生活場面での積極的な使用を促すことで麻痺側上肢の機能回復と神経可塑性を誘導することを目的とした治療法である.臨床的アウトカムの報告に加え,ニューロイメージング技術を用いた報告も数多くなされ,治療効果の背景が明らかにされてきている.
本稿では,CIMTの概要とfMRIによる先行研究,さらに下肢に対するCIMTなど近年報告が増えている応用形CIMTについて概説し,今後の展望を述べたい.
近年,神経科学分野において,機能的MRI(functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging:fMRI)や,近赤外分光法(Near Infrared Spectoroscopy:NIRS),経頭蓋磁気刺激(Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation:TMS)などの神経の活動を可視化するニューロイメージング技術の発展により,脳損傷後に脳の可塑的変化や脳機能の再構築が起きることが明らかにされた.脳卒中や脳外傷などの脳損傷者の運動機能,認知機能の回復機序について多くの知見が蓄積され,リハビリテーション分野の発展に大きく貢献した.
ニューロイメージングの発展を背景に,損傷後の神経機能回復促進を目的としたニューロリハビリテーションという概念が提唱されるようになった.電気刺激などで末梢器官から中枢神経系へ働きかけたり,麻痺肢を随意的に積極的に動かしたりすることで,脳の可塑的変化や神経ネットワークの再構築を促す治療である.
ニューロリハビリテーションのなかで最も多くの知見が示されている治療法の一つが,CI療法(Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy:CIMT)であろう.CIMTは,非麻痺側肢の使用を制限しながら麻痺肢に対する段階的な集中トレーニングと,日常生活場面での積極的な使用を促すことで麻痺側上肢の機能回復と神経可塑性を誘導することを目的とした治療法である.臨床的アウトカムの報告に加え,ニューロイメージング技術を用いた報告も数多くなされ,治療効果の背景が明らかにされてきている.
本稿では,CIMTの概要とfMRIによる先行研究,さらに下肢に対するCIMTなど近年報告が増えている応用形CIMTについて概説し,今後の展望を述べたい.
参考文献
1)Taub E:Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys:implications for rehabilitation medicine. In:Ince LP(ed):Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine:Clinical Applications. pp371-401, Williams & Wilkins, New York, 1980
2)Ostendorf CG, et al:Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. Phys Ther 61:1022-1028, 1981
3)道免和久(編):CI療法—脳卒中リハビリテーションの新たなアプローチ.中山書店,2008
4)Miller EL, et al:Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient:a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 41:2402-2448, 2010
5)小川 彰,他(編):脳卒中合同ガイドライン委員会(編):脳卒中治療ガイドライン2015.pp292-294,協和企画,2015
6)Wolf SL, et al;EXCITE Investigators. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke:the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296:2095-2104, 2006
7)Kwakkel G, et al:Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol 14:224-234, 2015
8)Peurala SH, et al:Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on activity and participation after stroke:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 26:209-223, 2012
9)Thrane G, et al:A meta-analysis of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. J Rehabil Med 46:833-842, 2014
10)Wolf SL, et al:Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy:the EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 7:33-40, 2008
11)Wolf SL, et al:The EXCITE stroke trial:comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 41:2309-2315, 2010
12)Morris DM, et al:Constraint-induced movement therapy:characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys 42:257-268, 2006
13)Takebayashi T, et al:A 6-month follow-up after constraint-induced movement therapy with and without transfer package for patients with hemiparesis after stroke:a pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 27:418-426, 2013
14)Cao Y, et al:Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after poststroke hemiparesis. Stroke 29:112-122, 1998
15)Marshall RS, et al:Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 31:656-661, 2000
16)Feydy A, et al:Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke:recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 33:1610-1617, 2002
17)Ward NS, et al:Neural correlates of outcome after stroke:a cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain 126:1430-1448, 2003
18)Ward NS, et al:Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke:a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain 126:2476-2496, 2003
19)Tombari D, et al:A longitudinal fMRI study:in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients. Neuroimage 23:827-839, 2004
20)Jaillard A, et al:Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? A longitudinal fMRI stroke study. Brain 128:1122-1138, 2005
21)Carey LM, et al:Evolution of brain activation with good and poor motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 20:24-41, 2006
22)Calautti C, et al:The relationship between motor deficit and hemisphere activation balance after stroke:A 3 T fMRI study. Neuroimage 34:322-331, 2007
23)Murayama T, et al:Changes in the brain activation balance in motor-related areas after constraint-induced movement therapy;a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain Inj 25:1047-1057, 2011
24)Cramer SC, et al:Activation of distinct motor cortex regions during ipsilateral and contralateral finger movements. J Neurophysiol 81:383-387, 1999
25)Dechaumont-Palacin S, et al:Neural correlates of proprioceptive integration in the contralesional hemisphere of very impaired patients shortly after a subcortical stroke:An fMRI study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22:288-297, 2008
26)Serrien DJ, et al:The importance of the dominant hemisphere in the organization of bimanual movements. Hum Brain Mapp 18:296-305, 2003
27)Nair DG, et al:Imaging correlates of motor recovery from cerebral infarction and their physiological significance in well-recovered patients. Neuroimage 34:253-263, 2007
28)Jang SH, et al:Cortical reorganization associated with motor recovery in hemiparetic stroke patients. Neuroreport 14:1305-1310, 2003
29)Ward NS, et al:Longitudinal changes in cerebral response to proprioceptive input in individual patients after stroke:an FMRI study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 20:398-405, 2006
30)Askim T, et al:Motor network changes associated with successful motor skill relearning after acute ischemic stroke:a longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23:295-304, 2009
31)Calautti C, et al:Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke:a longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm. Stroke 32:2534-2542, 2001
32)Small SL, et al:Cerebellar hemispheric activation ipsilateral to the paretic hand correlates with functional recovery after stroke. Brain 125:1544-1557, 2002
33)Fujii Y, et al:Cortical reorganization in patients with subcortical hemiparesis:neural mechanisms of functional recovery and prognostic implication. J Neurosurg 98:64-73, 2003
34)Levy CE, et al:Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 80:4-12, 2001
35)Schaechter JD, et al:Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients:a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16:326-338, 2002
36)Johansen-Berg H, et al:Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain 125:2731-2742, 2002
37)Kim YH, et al:Plastic changes of motor network after constraint-induced movement therapy. Yonsei Med J 45:241-246, 2004
38)Szaflarski JP, et al:Cortical reorganization following modified constraint-induced movement therapy:a study of 4 patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:1052-1058, 2006
39)Dong Y, et al:Motor cortex activation during treatment may predict therapeutic gains in paretic hand function after stroke. Stroke 37:1552-1555, 2006
40)Hamzei F, et al:Two different reorganization patterns after rehabilitative therapy:an exploratory study with fMRI and TMS. Neuroimage 31:710-720, 2006
41)Lin KC, et al:Constraint-induced therapy versus control intervention in patients with stroke:a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 89:177-185, 2010
42)Rijntjes M, et al:Activation changes in sensorimotor cortex during improvement due to CIMT in chronic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 29:299-310, 2011
43)Doyon J, et al:Distinct contribution of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia 41:252-262, 2003
44)Mark VW, et al:Constraint-induced movement therapy for the lower extremities in multiple sclerosis:case series with 4-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94:753-760, 2013
45)Wang W, et al:Constraint-induced movement therapy promotes brain functional reorganization in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Neural Regen Res 7:2548-2553, 2012
46)Chen YP, et al:Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper-extremity function in children with cerebral palsy:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 28:939-953, 2014
47)Sun SF, et al:Combined botulinum toxin type A with modified constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke patients with upper extremity spasticity:a randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:34-41, 2010
48)Bolognini N, et al:Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25:819-829, 2011
49)Dromerick AW, et al:Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation(VECTORS):A single-center RCT. Neurology 73:195-201, 2009
50)Wang L, et al:Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain 133:1224-1238, 2010
51)Dobkin BH, et al:International randomized clinical trial, stroke inpatient rehabilitation with reinforcement of walking speed(SIRROWS), improves outcomes. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:235-242, 2010
52)Nishimura Y, et al:Neural substrates for the motivational regulation of motor recovery after spinal-cord injury. PLoS One 6:e24854, 2011
掲載誌情報