1)Hari R, et al:Magnetoencephalography in the study of human somatosensory cortical processing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1999;354:1145-1154
2)Kakigi R, et al:The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields. Prog Neurobiol 2000;61:495-523
3)Onishi H, et al:Effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following mechanical tactile stimulation. Brain Res 2013;1535:78-88
4)Inui K, et al:Preferential stimulation of Aδ fibers by intra-epidermal needle electrode in humans. Pain 2002;96:247-252
5)Onishi H, et al:Muscle-afferent projection to the sensorimotor cortex after voluntary movement and motor-point stimulation:an MEG study. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122:605-610
6)Onishi H, et al:Neuromagnetic activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortex following tactile-on and tactile-off stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:588-593
7)Kakigi R, et al:Cerebral responses following stimulation of unmyelinated C-fibers in humans:electro- and magneto-encephalographic study. Neurosci Res 2003;45:255-275
8)Onishi H, et al:Part Ⅲ Somatosensory system, Clinical application. In. Tobimatsu S, et al(eds):Clinical application of Magnetoencephalography. pp73-93, Springer, Tokyo, 2016
9)Inui K, et al:Serial processing in the human somatosensory system. Cereb Cortex 2004;14:851-857
10)Nakamura A, et al:Somatosensory homunculus as drawn by MEG. Neuroimage 1998;7:377-386
11)Hesse MD, et al:Attenuation of somatosensory responses to self-produced tactile stimulation. Cereb Cortex 2010;20:425-432
12)Wacker E, et al:Tactile motion and pattern processing assessed with high-field FMRI. PLoS One 2011;6:e24860. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024860
13)Summers IR, et al:A functional-magnetic-resonance-imaging investigation of cortical activation from moving vibrotactile stimuli on the fingertip. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;125:1033-1039
14)van Kemenade BM, et al:Tactile and visual motion direction processing in hMT+/V5. Neuroimage 2014;84:420-427
15)van der Zwaag W, et al:Digit somatotopy in the human cerebellum:a 7T fMRI study. Neuroimage 2013;67:354-362
16)Yokota H, et al:Region-specific effects of 10-Hz transcranial alternate current stimulation over the left posterior parietal cortex and primary somatosensory area on tactile two-point discrimination threshold. Front Neurosci 2021;15:576526. doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.576526
17)Otsuru N, et al:10Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex facilitates tactile temporal order judgment. Behav Brain Res 2019;368:111899. doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111899
18)Saito K, et al:α-tACS over the somatosensory cortex enhances tactile spatial discrimination in healthy subjects with low alpha activity. Brain Behav 2021;11:e02019. doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2019
19)Goldreich D, et al:Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. J Neurosci 2003;23:3439-3445
20)Saito K, et al:Comparison of transcranial electrical stimulation regimens for effects on inhibitory circuit activity in primary somatosensory cortex and tactile spatial discrimination performance. Behav Brain Res 2019;375:112168. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112168
21)Yokota H, et al:Establishment of optimal two-point discrimination test method and consideration of reproducibility. Neurosci Lett 2020;714:134525. doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134525
22)Pleger B, et al:Functional imaging of perceptual learning in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex. Neuron 2003;40:643-653
23)Kojima S, et al:The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns. Sci Rep 2019;9:16677. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53275-2
24)Kojima S, et al:Modulation of corticospinal excitability depends on the pattern of mechanical tactile stimulation. Neural Plast 2018;2018:5383514. doi.org/10.1155/2018/5383514
25)Kojima S, et al:The intervention of mechanical tactile stimulation modulates somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and cortical oscillations. Eur J Neurosci 2021;53:3433-3446
26)Watanabe H, et al:The repetitive mechanical tactile stimulus intervention effects depend on input methods. Front Neurosci 2020;14:393. doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00393