BRAIN and NERVE－神経研究の進歩66巻4号

2014年04月発行

増大特集 タッチ・ビジョン・アクション

視覚的注意とその制御メカニズム

著者： 小川洋和¹

所属機関： ¹関西学院大学文学部総合心理科学科

ページ範囲：P.385 - P.392

文献概要

視覚的注意は，厳しい処理制限を持つ脳が膨大な視覚情報の処理を効率的に処理するための心的メカニズムである。これまで実験心理学の分野で多くの研究知見が蓄積され，また認知神経科学の分野でも非常に注目されているトピックスである。本稿は，その膨大な研究知見を整理し，現在わかっている視覚的注意の性質を，注意が「何に対して向けられるか」と「どのように向けられるか」に着目して概説する。

参考文献

1) Simons DJ, Levin DT: Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychon Bull Rev 5: 644-649, 1998

2) Rensink RA, O'Regan JK, Clark JJ: To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol Sci 8: 368-373, 1997

3) Grimes J: On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. Kathaleen AA (ed): Perception. Oxford University Press, New York, 1996, pp89-110

4) Henderson JM: Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object perception. Psychol Sci 8: 51-55, 1997

5) Irwin DE: Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cogn Psychol 23: 420-456, 1991

6) McConkie GW, Currie CB: Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22: 563-581, 1996

7) O'Regan JK, Deubel H, Clark JJ, Rensink RA: Picture changes during blinks: looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Vis Cogn 7: 191-212, 2000

8) Simons DJ, Levin DT: Change blindness. Trends Cogn Sci 1: 261-267, 1997

9) Rensink RA: The dynamic representation of scenes. Vis Cogn 7: 17-42, 2000

10) Posner MI: Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32A: 3-25, 1980

11) Eriksen CW, St James JD: Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model. Percept Psychophys 40: 225-240, 1986

12) Kowler E: Eye movements: the past 25 years. Vision Res 51: 1457-1483, 2011

13) Nakayama K, Martini P: Situating visual research. Vision Res 51: 1526-1537, 2011

14) Treisman AM, Gelade G: A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol 12: 97-136, 1980

15) Moore CM, Egeth H: How does feature-based attention affect visual processing? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24: 1296-1310, 1998

16) Shih SI, Sperling G: Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22: 758-779, 1996

17) Duncan J: Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J Exp Psychol Gen 113: 501-517, 1984

18) Egly R, Driver J, Rafal RD: Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J Exp Psychol Gen 123: 161-177, 1994

19) Behrmann M, Zemel R, Mozer M: Object-based attention and occlusion: evidence from normal participants and a computational model. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24: 1011-1036, 1998

20) Moore CM, Yantis S, Vaughan B: Object-based visual selection: evidence from perceptual completion. Psychol Sci 9: 104-110, 1998

21) Yantis S, Johnston JC: On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16: 135, 1990

22) Wolfe JM: Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychon Bull Rev 1: 202-238, 1994

23) Wolfe JM, Cave KR, Franzel SL: Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15: 419-433, 1989

24) Theeuwes J: Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Percept Psychophys 50: 184-193, 1991

25) Theeuwes J: Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Percept Psychophys 51: 599-606, 1992

26) Theeuwes J: Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20: 799-806, 1994

27) Theeuwes J, de Vries G J, Godijn R: Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons. Percept Psychophys 65: 735-746, 2003

28) Yantis S, Hillstrom AP: Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20: 95-107, 1994

29) Horstmann G, Ansorge U: Attentional shifts to rare singletons. Vis Cogn 14: 295-325, 2006

30) Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC: Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18: 1030-1044, 1992

31) Bacon WF, Egeth HE: Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Percept Psychophys 55: 485-496, 1994

32) Folk CL, Anderson BA: Target uncertainty and attentional capture: color singleton set or multiple top-down control settings? Psychon Bull Rev 17: 421-426, 2010

33) Theeuwes J: Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica 135: 77-99, 2010

34) Belopolsky AV, Schreij D, Theeuwes J: What is top-down about contingent capture? Atten Percept Psychophys 72: 326-341, 2010

35) Sawaki R, Luck SJ: Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Atten Percept Psychophys 72: 1455-1470, 2010

36) Anderson BA: A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. J Vis 13: 7: 1-16, 2013

37) Awh E, Belopolsky AV, Theeuwes J: Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci 16: 437-443, 2012

38) Chun MM, Jiang Y: Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cogn Psychol 36: 28-71, 1998

39) Pessoa L, Engelmann JB: Embedding reward signals into perception and cognition. Front Neurosci 4: 17, 2010

40) Hickey C, Chelazzi L, Theeuwes J: Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. J Neurosci 30: 11096-11103, 2010