BRAIN and NERVE－神経研究の進歩70巻10号

2018年10月発行

特集 「左脳と右脳」の現在

社会性と左右差

著者： 小早川睦貴¹

所属機関： ¹東京情報大学総合情報学部総合情報学科

ページ範囲：P.1067 - P.1073

文献概要

ヒトの社会性を支える，情動や心の理論に関する神経基盤について左右半球の機能を比較した。心の理論については，共感，メンタライジング，視点取得などの要素に分けて検討がなされてきた。内側前頭前野，上側頭溝領域，側頭頭頂接合部など心の理論に関する領域では，全体として右半球の優位性を示す知見が多くみられるものの，メンタライジングや視点取得に関しては，両半球が異なる役割を持っていることが示されている。

参考文献

1)Silberman EK, Weingartner H: Hemispheric lateralization of functions related to emotion. Brain Cogn 5: 322-353, 1986

2)Rodway P, Schepman A: Valence specific laterality effects in prosody: expectancy account and the effects of morphed prosody and stimulus lead. Brain Cogn 63: 31-41, 2007

3)Hoptman MJ, Levy J: Perceptual asymmetries in left- and right-handers for cartoon and real faces. Brain Cogn 8: 178-188, 1988

4)Schepman A, Rodway P, Pritchard H: Right-lateralized unconscious, but not conscious, processing of affective environmental sounds. Laterality 21: 606-632, 2016

5)Fleva E, Khan A: An examination of the leftward cradling bias among typically developing adults high on autistic traits. Laterality 20: 711-722, 2015

6)Adolphs R, Damasio H, Tranel D, Cooper G, Damasio AR: A role for somatosensory cortices in the visual recognition of emotion as revealed by three-dimensional lesion mapping. J Neurosci 20: 2683-2690, 2000

7)Gorelick PB, Ross ED: The aprosodias: further functional-anatomical evidence for the organisation of affective language in the right hemisphere. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50: 553-560, 1987

8)Gola KA, Shany-Ur T, Pressman P, Sulman I, Galeana E, et al: A neural network underlying intentional emotional facial expression in neurodegenerative disease. NeuroImage Clin 14: 672-678, 2017

9)Baldo JV, Kacinik NA, Moncrief A, Beghin F, Dronkers NF: You may now kiss the bride: interpretation of social situations by individuals with right or left hemisphere injury. Neuropsychologia 80: 133-141, 2016

10)Bramham J, Morris RG, Hornak J, Bullock P, Polkey CE: Social and emotional functioning following bilateral and unilateral neurosurgical prefrontal cortex lesions. J Neuropsychol 3: 125-143, 2009

11)Carrington SJ, Bailey AJ: Are there theory of mind regions in the brain? A review of the neuroimaging literature. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 2313-2335, 2009

12)Ruby P, Decety J: How would you feel versus how do you think she would feel? A neuroimaging study of perspective-taking with social emotions. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 988-999, 2004

13)Aichhorn M, Perner J, Kronbichler M, Staffen W, Ladurner G: Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind? NeuroImage 30: 1059-1068, 2006

14)Aichhorn M, Perner J, Weiss B, Kronbichler M, Staffen W, et al: Temporo-parietal junction activity in theory-of-mind tasks: falseness, beliefs, or attention. J Cogn Neurosci 21: 1179-1192, 2009

15)Shamay-Tsoory SG, Tomer R, Berger BD, Aharon-Peretz J: Characterization of empathy deficits following prefrontal brain damage: the role of the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 15: 324-337, 2003

16)Shamay-Tsoory SG, Tomer R, Aharon-Peretz J: The neuroanatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relationship to social cognition. Neuropsychology 19: 288-300, 2005

17)Shamay-Tsoory SG, Tomer R, Berger BD, Goldsher D, Aharon-Peretz J: Impaired “affective theory of mind” is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cogn Behav Neurol 18: 55-67, 2005

18)Leopold A, Krueger F, dal Monte O, Pardini M, Pulaski SJ, et al: Damage to the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex impacts affective theory of mind. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 7: 871-880, 2012

19)Boes AD, Grafft AH, Joshi C, Chuang NA, Nopoulos P, et al: Behavioral effects of congenital ventromedial prefrontal cortex malformation. BMC Neurol 11: 151, 2011［doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-151］

20)Seitz RJ, Nickel J, Azari NP: Functional modularity of the medial prefrontal cortex: involvement in human empathy. Neuropsychology 20: 743-751, 2006

21)Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G: Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 267-278, 2000

22)Puce A, Allison T, Asgari M, Gore JC, McCarthy G: Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings, and textures: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 16: 5205-5215, 1996

23)Narumoto J, Okada T, Sadato N, Fukui K, Yonekura Y: Attention to emotion modulates fMRI activity in human right superior temporal sulcus. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 12: 225-231, 2001

24)Pelphrey KA, Morris JP, McCarthy G: Neural basis of eye gaze processing deficits in autism. Brain 128: 1038-1048, 2005

25)Wyk BC, Hudac CM, Carter EJ, Sobel DM, Pelphrey KA: Action understanding in the superior temporal sulcus region. Psychol Sci 20: 771-777, 2009

26)Castelli F, Frith C, Happé F, Frith U: Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain 125: 1839-1849, 2002

27)Gallagher HL, Frith CD: Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends Cogn Sci 7: 77-83, 2003

28)Baron-Cohen S, Ring HA, Wheelwright S, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, et al: Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 11: 1891-1898, 1999

29)Gallagher HL, Happé F, Brunswick N, Fletcher PC, Frith U, et al: Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia 38: 11-21, 2000

30)Zilbovicius M, Meresse I, Chabane N, Brunelle F, Samson Y, et al: Autism, the superior temporal sulcus and social perception. Trends Neurosci 29: 359-366, 2006

31)Akiyama T, Kato M, Muramatsu T, Saito F, Nakachi R, et al: A deficit in discriminating gaze direction in a case with right superior temporal gyrus lesion. Neuropsychologia 44: 161-170, 2006

32)Akiyama T, Kato M, Muramatsu T, Saito F, Umeda S, et al: Gaze but not arrows: a dissociative impairment after right superior temporal gyrus damage. Neuropsychologia 44: 1804-1810, 2006

33)小早川睦貴, 鶴谷奈津子, 河村　満: 両側上側頭溝領域病変の1例における視線の認知. 第34回　日本高次脳機能障害学会（旧　日本失語症学会）学術総会; 2010年11月18〜19日, 大宮

34)Shamay-Tsoory SG, Tomer R, Goldsher D, Berger BD, Aharon-Peretz J: Impairment in cognitive and affective empathy in patients with brain lesions: anatomical and cognitive correlates. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 26: 1113-1127, 2004

35)Leigh R, Oishi K, Hsu J, Lindquist M, Gottesman RF, et al: Acute lesions that impair affective empathy. Brain 136: 2539-2549, 2013

36)Kim EH, Chien JH, Liu CC, Oishi K, Oishi K, et al: Stroke of bad luck? Neurocase 23: 70-78, 2017

37)Toller G, Adhimoolam B, Grunwald T, Huppertz HJ, Kurthen M, et al: Right mesial temporal lobe epilepsy impairs empathy-related brain responses to dynamic fearful faces. J Neurol 262: 729-741, 2015

38)Toller G, Adhimoolam B, Rankin KP, Huppertz HJ, Kurthen M, et al: Right fronto-limbic atrophy is associated with reduced empathy in refractory unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychologia 78: 80-87, 2015

39)Yamano M, Akamatsu N, Tsuji S, Kobayakawa M, Kawamura M: Decision-making in temporal lobe epilepsy examined with the Iowa gambling task. Epilepsy Res 93: 33-38, 2011

40)Irish M, Hodges JR, Piguet O: Right anterior temporal lobe dysfunction underlies theory of mind impairments in semantic dementia. Brain 137: 1241-1253, 2014

41)Perry RJ, Rosen HR, Kramer JH, Beer JS, Levenson RL, et al: Hemispheric dominance for emotions, empathy and social behaviour: evidence from right and left handers with frontotemporal dementia. Neurocase 7: 145-160, 2001

42)Mendez MF, Lim GT: Alterations of the sense of “humanness” in right hemisphere predominant frontotemporal dementia patients. Cogn Behav Neurol 17: 133-138, 2004

43)Kim SH, Hamann S: Neural correlates of positive and negative emotion regulation. J Cogn Neurosci 19: 776-798, 2007

44)Wager TD, Davidson ML, Hughes BL, Lindquist MA, Ochsner KN: Prefrontal-subcortical pathways mediating successful emotion regulation. Neuron 59: 1037-1050, 2008

45)Himichi T, Nomura M: Modulation of empathy in the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex facilitates altruistic behavior: An fNIRS study. J Integr Neurosci 14: 207-222, 2015

46)Minio-Paluello I, Avenanti A, Aglioti SM: Left hemisphere dominance in reading the sensory qualities of others' pain? Soc Neurosci 1: 320-333, 2006

47)David N, Aumann C, Santos NS, Bewernick BH, Eickhoff SB, et al: Differential involvement of the posterior temporal cortex in mentalizing but not perspective taking. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 3: 279-289, 2008

48)Herbet G, Lafargue G, Moritz-Gasser S, Bonnetblanc F, Duffau H: Interfering with the neural activity of mirror-related frontal areas impairs mentalistic inferences. Brain Struct Funct 220: 2159-2169, 2015

49)Stone VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT: Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. J Cogn Neurosci 10: 640-656, 1998

50)Happé F, Brownell H, Winner E: Acquired ‘theory of mind’ impairments following stroke. Cognition 70: 211-240, 1999

51)Surian L, Siegal M: Sources of performance on theory of mind tasks in right hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain Lang 78: 224-232, 2001

52)Winner E, Brownell H, Happé F, Blum A, Pincus D: Distinguishing lies from jokes: theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang 62: 89-106, 1998

53)Siegal M, Carrington J, Radel M: Theory of mind and pragmatic understanding following right hemisphere damage. Brain Lang 53: 40-50, 1996

54)Yeh ZT, Tsai CF: Impairment on theory of mind and empathy in patients with stroke. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 68: 612-620, 2014

55)Stuss DT, Gallup GG Jr, Alexander MP: The frontal lobes are necessary for ‘theory of mind’. Brain 124: 279-286, 2001

56)Frith CD, Frith U: The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50: 531-534, 2006

57)Vogeley K, Bussfeld P, Newen A, Herrmann S, Happé F, et al: Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. NeuroImage 14: 170-181, 2001

58)Mossad SI, AuCoin-Power M, Urbain C, Smith ML, Pang EW, et al: Thinking about the thoughts of others; temporal and spatial neural activation during false belief reasoning. NeuroImage 134: 320-327, 2016

59)Mason RA, Just MA: Differentiable cortical networks for inferences concerning people's intentions versus physical causality. Hum Brain Mapp 32: 313-329, 2011

60)Mano Y, Harada T, Sugiura M, Saito DN, Sadato N: Perspective-taking as part of narrative comprehension: a functional MRI study. Neuropsychologia 47: 813-824, 2009

61)Young L, Saxe R: An FMRI investigation of spontaneous mental state inference for moral judgment. J Cog Neurosci 21: 1396-1405, 2009

62)Decety J, Sommerville JA: Shared representations between self and other: a social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends Cogn Sci 7: 527-533, 2003

63)Decety J, Lamm C: The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist 13: 580-593, 2007

64)Santiesteban I, Banissy MJ, Catmur C, Bird G: Functional lateralization of temporoparietal junction - imitation inhibition, visual perspective-taking and theory of mind. Eur J Neurosci 42: 2527-2533, 2015

65)Samson D, Apperly IA, Chiavarino C, Humphreys GW: Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief. Nat Neurosci 7: 499-500, 2004

66)Apperly IA, Samson D, Chiavarino C, Humphreys GW: Frontal and temporo-parietal lobe contributions to theory of mind: neuropsychological evidence from a false-belief task with reduced language and executive demands. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 1773-1784, 2004