循環器ジャーナル67巻3号

2019年07月発行

特集 循環器疾患の画像診断—現状と進歩 Ⅱ．虚血性心疾患

冠動脈CTでどこまで見えるか

著者： 高木英誠¹ 折居誠¹ 吉岡邦浩¹

所属機関： ¹岩手医科大学付属病院循環器放射線科

ページ範囲：P.331 - P.343

Point
・冠動脈CTは様々な臨床シナリオに応用可能な検査だが，ガイドラインを参考に適切に使用する．
・冠動脈CTは一般的なCTよりもアーチファクトを生じやすいため，撮影原理やアーチファクトの知識が正しい画像評価につながる．

参考文献

1) 一般社団法人日本循環器学会：循環器疾患診療実態調査報告書，http://www.j-circ.or.jp/jittai_chosa/

2) González AB de, Darby S:Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays:estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363:345-351, 2004

3) 山岸正和，玉木長良：慢性冠動脈疾患診断ガイドライン（2018年改訂版），2019

4) Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al:SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography:a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 8:342-358, 2014

5) Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al:CAD-RADS（TM）Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography（SCCT）, the American College of Radiology（ACR）and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging（NASCI）. Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:269-281, 2016

6) Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al:ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1864-1894, 2010

7) Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al:2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 126:e354-e471, 2012

8) Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al:2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease:the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34:2949-3003, 2013

9) NICE:Chest pain of recent onset:assessment and diagnosis, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg95

10) Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al:Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324-2336, 2008

11) Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al:Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease:results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY（Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography）trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724-1732, 2008

12) Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Rochitte CE, et al:Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64（Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography）International Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:379-387, 2012

13) Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al:Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213-224, 2009

14) Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, et al:Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 372:1291-1300, 2015

15) SCOT-HEART Investigators:Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med 379:924-933, 2018

16) Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al:Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease:the NXT trial（Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography:Next Steps）. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1145-1155, 2014

17) Douglas PS, Pontone G, Hlatky MA, et al:Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease:the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR（CT）:outcome and resource impacts study. Eur Heart J 36:3359-3367, 2015

18) 筒井裕之，磯部光章，伊藤　宏，et al：急性・慢性心不全診療ガイドライン（2017年改訂版），2018

19) Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos PA, et al:Higher intracoronary attenuation improves diagnostic accuracy in MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 187:W430-W433, 2006

20) Maroules CD, Hamilton-Craig C, Branch K, et al:Coronary artery disease reporting and data system（CAD-RADSTM）:Inter-observer agreement for assessment categories and modifiers. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12:125-130, 2018

21) Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al:A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation 51(4 Suppl):5-40, 1975

22) Takagi H, Tanaka R, Nagata K, et al:Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography with ultra-high-resolution CT:Comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol 101:30-37, 2018